Legal Opinion
Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. Solomon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 4, 1987No. 13083PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiff, Marsh, Day & Calhoun, brought this action against the defendant, Elisabeth Solomon, to recover legal fees for services rendered to her. The defendant filed a counterclaim alleging that, upon the termination of their attorney-client relationship, the plaintiff had wrongfully refused, despite demand, to return her files. In her counterclaim, the defendant sought damages and an order directing the plaintiff to return the files. During the trial to the jury, the trial court ruled that it would itself decide that part of the counterclaim which sought an order directing the plaintiff…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- 24 Leggett Street Ltd. Partnership v. Beacon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Chrysler Corp. v. MaioccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.