Legal Opinion
National Iron Bank v. Gelormino
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 23, 1992No. 10823PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The named defendant and the defendant Irene B. Gelormino appeal from the decision of the trial court denying their motion to open1 a judgment of foreclosure by sale claiming that the trial court abused its discretion and committed an error of law. We disagree.
In May, 1991, the plaintiff bank instituted foreclosure proceedings against the Gelorminos. The Gelorminos failed to file responsive pleadings and the trial court rendered a default judgment against them. The Gelorminos subsequently sought to open the default judgment pursuant to General Statutes § 52-212. “To qualify under § 52-212, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- D'OCCHIO v. Connecticut Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sasso v. AleshinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Bartlett v. BartlettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRiccoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Tutsky v. YMCA of GreenwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Pollio v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Rodriguez v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Bergin v. Department of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.