Legal Opinion

Weber v. Pinyan

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1937No. L. A. 16174PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J., pro tem.

This action was brought under the provisions of section 1714% of the Civil Code reading in part: “Every owner of a motor vehicle shall be liable and responsible for the death of or injury to person or property resulting from negligence in the operation of such motor vehicle, in the business of such owner or otherwise, by any person using or operating the same with the permission, express or implied, of such owner”; and section 141% of the California Vehicle Act reading in part: “Any person who as a guest accepts a ride in any vehicle, . . . and while so riding as such…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API