Legal Opinion

Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1919No. Civ. No. 2722PublishedCited by 42 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.

Appeal from judgment of nonsuit rendered in an action for damages for personal injuries tried before a jury. The injuries are alleged to have been suffered by reason of the negligent driving by one West of an automobile owned by the defendant and respondent, Chevrolet Motor Company of California, a corporation. West, the driver of the ear, was named as a defendant in the complaint, but no service of summons- was made upon him, and the case proceeded to trial against the Motor Company as the sole defendant, whose motion for nonsuit was granted at the close of the plaintiff’s case.

Appellant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Shepard v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Hartley v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API