Legal Opinion

Kraft Construction Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1998No. 72095PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James M. Porter, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee Kraft Construction Company (“Kraft”) appeals from a directed verdict in favor of defendants-appellees/cross-appellants Cuyahoga County Board of Commissioners and the Sanitary Engineering Division of the County Department of Community Services (collectively “the county”) arising out of Kraft’s claims that the county was liable in conversion and trespass for its use of a sewage pumping station constructed by Kraft. The county cross-appeals contending that the trial court erred in awarding damages for unjust enrichment to Kraft…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Schade v. Carnegie Body Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. The Andersons, Inc. v. Consol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Revilo Tyluka, L.L.C. v. Simon Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Javitch v. First Montauk Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  4. Current Source, Inc. v. Elyria City School DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Perrysburg Township v. City of RossfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API