Legal Opinion
Polednak v. Rent Control Board of Cambridge
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 9, 1986PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
In this case we consider questions of law reported by a judge in the Superior Court, which the parties contend raise the issue whether the plaintiff is entitled to occupy her own condominium unit without a removal permit in light of Flynn v. Cambridge, 383 Mass. 152 (1981), and the Supreme Court’s subsequent pronouncements in Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982). We took the case on our own motion and hold under the law of the Commonwealth that she is so entitled and thus we do not reach the question of what effect, if any, the decision of Loretto v. Teleprompter…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Sheffield Bd. of Comm'rsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lynn Teachers Union, Local 1037 v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Boylston Development Group, Inc. v. 22 Boylston Street Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Steinbergh v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. KapsalisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Gilbert v. City of CambridgeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.