Legal Opinion
Steinbergh v. City of Cambridge
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 10, 1992PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
In Steinbergh v. Rent Control Bd. of Cambridge, 406 Mass. 147 (1989) (Steinbergh I), this court held that the city of Cambridge lacked authority to adopt a particular ordinance provision intended to discourage the unlawful removal of rent-controlled housing units from the rental market. That provision, a subsection of the city’s ordinance concerning the removal of rent-controlled properties from the market, purported to restrict the sale of individual condominium units by a property owner owning more than one condominium unit in a building. The ordinance provision denied such an owner the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Attorney General v. M.C.K., Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Greenfield Country Estates Tenants Ass'n v. DeepMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Lopes v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.