Legal Opinion

United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1968No. 363PublishedCited by 448 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

These cases stem from proceedings conducted by the Federal Communications Commission after requests by Midwest Television1 for relief under §§ 74.11072 and *16074.1109 3 of the rules promulgated by the Commission for the regulation of community antenna television (CATV) systems. Midwest averred that respondents’ CATV systems transmitted the signals of Los Angeles broadcasting stations into the San Diego area, and thereby had, inconsistently with the public interest, adversely affected Midwest’s San Diego station.4 Midwest sought an appropriate order limiting the carriage of such signals by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by448 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

443 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API