Legal Opinion
Boylston Development Group, Inc. v. 22 Boylston Street Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 27, 1992PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
At issue is whether the plaintiff’s 1 obligation to pay the defendant relocation assistance benefits is governed by § 7 or § 14 of G. L. c. 79A (1990 ed.). The bureau of relocation (BOR) in the Executive Office of Communities and Development determined that the plaintiff was required to pay full relocation benefits under § 7. A Superior Court judge set aside the BOR’s decision and ruled that the plaintiff’s relocation assistance obligation arose out of § 14, which mandates reimbursement only for actual moving expenses.
In her decision, the judge remanded the action to the BOR for a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Massachusetts Medical Society v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Santa Maria v. TrottoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In Re Michael J. Colarusso Mary Colarusso, Debtors, Robert Canzano, Trustee of the J & B Realty Trust Joan Canzano, Trustee of the J & B Realty Trust v. Mary M. RagosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Greene v. General Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Stanley A. Rodowicz v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Stanley A. Rodowicz v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Simon v. SimonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.