Legal Opinion
Basta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1928PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
During the year 1921 and for some years previously, the plaintiff and twenty-one other individuals were engaged in the operation of jitneys over a route in the city of Waterbury, each owning and operating his own car. Plaintiff’s car was then registered in his individual name, and he carried liability insurance upon the car under a policy issued to him by the defendant. In 1922, after the passage of certain legislation regarding the operation of public service cars and insurance upon the same, the public utilities commission refused to issue to the plaintiff and these other individuals a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mason-Henry Press v. . &198tna L. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Joseph Gordon, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Sargent Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- DiFrancesco v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Missionaries of the Co. of Mary, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Salonen v. PaanenenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.