Legal Opinion

DiFrancesco v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 18, 1926PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The record discloses that there was no controversy as to the following facts: The plaintiff, on March 24th, 1923, was insured by a policy of the defendant, wherein it agreed to indemnify her against loss from the liability imposed by law upon her for damages on account of bodily injuries accidentally suffered or alleged to have been suffered by any person as a result of the ownership, maintenance or use of the automobile then owned by her. The policy further provided that the defendant was to give prompt and efficient service (a) in investigating cases of bodily injuries or death or of damage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dwelling House Insurance v. DowdallIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lee v. Casualty Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Germania Fire Insurance v. PitcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Searle v. Dwelling House InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. CosgriffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  3. Breen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Basta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API