Legal Opinion

Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Wachsmith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1940No. 27719PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This is an appeal by defendants, ft. Wachsmith and wife, Richard Wachsmith, Jr., Carl Buss, United Pacific Insurance Company, and Harry L. Olson, from a declaratory judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Associated Indemnity Corporation, on February 4, 1939.

On September 17,1935, Carl Buss, above named, was injured in an automobile collision between a truck, owned by R. Wachsmith, Sr., but which at the time was being operated by his son, Richard Wachsmith, Jr., and an automobile owned by one Kenneth Martin. At the time of the accident, Buss was in the employ of R. Wachsmith, Sr., and was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Lunt v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Peterson v. MaloneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Birrenkott v. Mc ManamaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. v. American General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  5. Transport Insurance Co. v. Standard Oil Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1960

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API