Schurgast v. Schumann
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
In the original action, the plaintiff, Anselm Sehurgast, seeks to recover damages for the destruction by fire of a house which the defendant Eoger M. Schumann had agreed to construct for him. The first count sounds in negligence and sets forth specific acts of negligence by Schumann and his employees, the defendants Louis Corte and Eodney Weed. In the second count, Sehurgast alleges facts for the obvious purpose of relating the essential elements of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Although no demurrer was addressed to this count, it should be noted that, since there is no allegation of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Sims Ex Rel. Ruark v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Missionaries of the Co. of Mary, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- United States v. Lonnie Leroy HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Dyback v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.