Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Reilly
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 5, 2010No. Civil Action 09-521 (RJL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ronald Anderson, 1 a prisoner in federal custody under sentence imposed by the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, has filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a Commissioner and Examiner of the United States Parole Commission, as well as unidentified John and Jane Does, for allegedly violating the ex post facto clause of the Constitution. Const. Art. 1, § 9. Anderson seeks money damages as well as prospective injunctive and declaratory relief. The defendants’ motion to dismiss, opposed by Anderson, will be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nelson v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Leyland v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McIntyre v. FulwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Stoddard v. WynnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jones v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.