Legal Opinion
Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-0781(RBW)PublishedCited by 469 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon defendants’ first and second motions for partial dismissal of plaintiffs complaint alleging intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2401-2680 (2000), and violations of both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2000), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 630(f) (2000). The defendants seek dismissal under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) or 12(b)(6).…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by469 opinions
- Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hinton v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Golden v. Mgmt. & Training Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Epps v. U.S. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
464 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.