Legal Opinion
Leyland v. Edwards
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 6, 2011No. Civil Case 10-2327 (RJL)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.
Plaintiff David John Leyland (“plaintiff’ or “Leyland”) brought an action for damages pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and for injunctive relief against defendant Miller Edwards (“defendant” or “Edwards”), contending that defendant violated the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause when he declined to return plaintiffs property previously seized by the United States Park Police. Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint. After due…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Beattie v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Smith v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Errol Houston, Jr. v. New Orleans CityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Baird v. HoltonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Errol Houston, Jr. v. New Orleans CityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.