Legal Opinion
Hitchcock v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 15, 1937No. 11955PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, Presiding Justice.
“An order merely dissolving a previous temporary restraining order, though passed after submission of evidence and argument of counsel at interlocutory hearing, is not a refusal of injunction on which writ of error-lies.” Such an order can not by mere inference or implication be construed' as a refusal of an interlocutory injunction, and that question remains “to be heard and passed on.” This is true regardless of the language of the judge in giving reasons for the dissolution. Wofford Oil Co. v. Nashville, 177 Ga. 460 (170 S. E. 369), and cit.; Johnson v. Troup County…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burkhalter v. RoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- United Glass Co. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Wofford Oil Co. v. City of NashvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Reardon v. BlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Cook County v. Thornhill Wagon Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Jones v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Henderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.