Legal Opinion
Grizzel v. Grizzel
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 24, 1939No. 12831PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
On an application fox injunction the judge, on a proper showing, may grant without notice to the defendant a "“temporary restraining order,” until the hearing or further order of the court, which shall have all the force and effect of an injunction until rescinded or modified by the court. Upon such a temporary restraining order being granted, it is the duty of the judge to cause sufficient notice to be given to the defendant as to the time and place for an interlocutory hearing to be had thereon. Code, § 55-201; Webb v. Hicks, 117 Ga. 335, 340 (43 S. E. 738); Young v.…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Webb v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Stubbs v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Hollinshead v. Town of LincolntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. OverbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Huiet v. Schwob Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- City of Cedartown v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Moss v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Edwards v. United Food Brokers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.