Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1939No. 12742PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. The parties to a bill of exceptions “can not confer jurisdiction upon the Supreme Court by agreement, for the purpose of testing certain questions involved in their case” (Bass v. Bass, 73 Ga. 134, 75 Ga. 883); and where it is apparent that this court has no jurisdiction, it is the duty of the court on its own motion to raise such question, and to dismiss the writ of error. Welborne v. State, 114 Ga. 793, 795, 796 (40 S. E. 857); Van Ormer v. Harris, 184 Ga. 411 (191 S. E. 378); Gilbert v. Tippins, 183 Ga. 497 (2, 3) (188 S. E. 699); Johnson v. Battle, 120 Ga. 649 (48 S.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Welborne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Johnson v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Hitchcock v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Carhart v. MackleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baggett Transportation Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Brumfield v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Ferguson v. Randolph CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Robinson v. Georgia Power CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API