Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Bland

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1950No. 16978PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is insisted by counsel for the plaintiff in error that, since the judgments on the demurrers were entered at the interlocutory hearing and before the appearance day of the case, the trial court was without jurisdiction, and that for this reason the judgment should be reversed. This contention is without merit. Prior to the adoption by the General Assembly in 1946 of the new rules of procedure, pleading, and practice (Ga. L. 1946, p. 761), the Code, § 81-1002, provided: “In all cases demurrer, pleas and answer shall be disposed of in the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Burress v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Shippen v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Merchants' Bank v. RawlsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  4. Jasper School District v. GormleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Calbeck v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roughton v. THIELE KAOLIN COMPANYSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  2. Head v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. State of Georgia v. SanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  4. Binford v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. Clifton v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API