Legal Opinion

Burkhalter v. Roach

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1916PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Writ of error; from Evans. Motion to dismiss.

1Per curiam

1. As to writs of error other than what are known as “fast writs,” the statute declares that “No cause shall be carried to the Supreme Court upon any bill of exceptions, so long as the same is pending in the court below,- unless the decision or judgment complained of, if it had been rendered as claimed by the plaintiff in error, would have been a final disposition of the cause, or final as to some material party thereto.” Civil Code (1910), § 6138.

2. Where the only error assigned in the bill of exceptions is on the refusal of the court to allow a certain amendment to the plaintiff’s petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Canuet & Simmons v. Seaboard Air-Line RailwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Prater v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. United Glass Co. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Harms v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. A. C. Alexander Lumber Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Hitchcock v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Douglas v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Huson v. Bank of CovingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API