Legal Opinion

Wofford Oil Co. v. City of Nashville

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 8, 1933No. 9197PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

Upon the presentation of a petition for injunction and other relief, the judge granted an order temporarily restraining the defendant, and requiring appearance at a future time and place to show cause why the prayers of the petition should not be granted. Thereafter the judge rendered the following decision: “The within-stated case coming on regularly for interlocutory hearing; and after submission of evidence and argument of counsel, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that the temporary restrain*461ing order heretofore granted be and the same is hereby dissolved, for the reason that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stubbs v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Hollinshead v. Town of LincolntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Putnam Mills & Power Co. v. StonecypherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Touchton v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Bradfield v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Hitchcock v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Jones v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Harris v. StowersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Johnson v. Troup County Rural Electrification Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API