Legal Opinion
Goe v. Gifford
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 10, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.
The appellant is a duly licensed dentist who has been practicing his profession in the city of Richmond since November, 1930. It had been his custom to advertise extensively, through the newspapers, the prices, terms or fees charged for his professional services, free dental examinations of and guaranteed satisfactory dental work to all who seek his services. Such advertisements, from time to time, were illustrated with photographic cuts of teeth or bridge work.
In 1936 the General Assembly, by an act effective on June 18 of that year (Acts of Assembly 1936, ch. 82, p. 105), amended Code,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Otis v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Young v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ritholz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Olson v. State Conservation CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Economy Optical Co. v. Kentucky Board of Optometric ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
- Phillips v. Virginia Board of MedicineDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.