Legal Opinion

Gorieb v. Fox

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1927No. 799PublishedCited by 242 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

For the declared purpose of establishing building lines and regulating and restricting the construction and location of buildings, and for other purposes, an ordinance of Roanoke, Virginia, divides the city into “ business ” and “residential” districts. Another ordinance, as amended July 11,1924, creates a set-back or building line, with relation to the street, to which all buildings subsequently erected must conform. The line must be at least as far from the street ad that occupied by sixty per cent, of the existing houses in the block, the word “ block ” being de fined to mean only that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by242 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API