Legal Opinion

Economy Optical Co. v. Kentucky Board of Optometric Examiners

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 28, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

The ophthalmic dispensers, represented as a class by the Economy Optical Co., Inc., et al., have appealed from a judgment in favor of the Kentucky Board of Optometric Examiners, et al. It was held that the appellants were prohibited by statute from advertising by any means whatsoever the cost or price' of visual aid glasses.

The statute involved is KRS 320.300, which, in part, is:

“It shall be unlawful and a violation of the provisions of this chapter for any person:

* * * ‡ * *

“(3) To advertise by any means whatsoever, directly or indirectly, the cost or price of visual aid…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Commonwealth v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Sage-Allen Co., Inc. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Jefferson County Board of Education v. Fell ex rel. L.F.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Graham v. MillsKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Light v. City of LouisvilleKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gearhart v. Kentucky State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API