Meier & Frank Co. v. Smith-Sanders
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Employer seeks review of an order by the Workers’ Compensation Board holding it responsible for medical expenses associated with claimant’s non-compensable injury and assessing penalties and attorney fees. We reverse on the penalties and attorney fees. Otherwise, we affirm.
The Board accepted the referee’s findings. Claimant suffered a compensable back injury in June, 1988. She had returned to her job by June, 1989, working part-time, when she allegedly injured her right knee, requiring surgery. Claimant sought authorization from employer for the surgery in July, 1989. Employer gave oral…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marshall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Bash v. Fir Grove Cemeteries, Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Stovall v. Sally Salmon SeafoodOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Eastmoreland Hospital v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tri-Met, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Meier & Frank Co. v. Smith-SandersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Swift & McCormick Metal Processors Ass'n v. DurbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Saif Corp. v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Tri-Met, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.