Legal Opinion

Bash v. Fir Grove Cemeteries, Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1978No. TC 76-0026, SC 25121PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, J.,

Pro Tempore.

This case involves an action brought by plaintiff against defendant cemetery corporation to recover damages for the unauthorized handling of her husband’s remains. She appeals from an adverse judgment entered after a jury rendered a verdict for the defendant. She assigns as error the court’s instruction to the effect that disinterments could be performed by the cemetery where the spouse has by her statements or conduct led the cemetery to conclude that it had the right to disinter remains without the written consent of the spouse or without court order. Three issues…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Community Bank v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hovis v. City of BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Willis v. StagerOregon Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Oregon Bank v. Nautilus Crane & Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Stovall v. Sally Salmon SeafoodOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  5. Mittleman Properties v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API