Tri-Met, Inc. v. Wolfe
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*558ARMSTRONG, J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board), contending that the board erred in awarding claimant insurer-paid attorney fees pursuant to ORS 656.382(1). We affirm.
The facts are undisputed. Employer delayed its acceptance of claimant’s work-related arm injury beyond the 90 days authorized by statute for acceptance or denial of a claim, ORS 656.262(6)(a).1 Claimant requested a hearing, asserting a de facto denial and seeking penalties and attorney fees. Employer accepted the claim several days later. By that time, claimant had incurred medical bills…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- COST SECURITY v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Morgan v. Stimson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Red Robin International v. DombroskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Kachel v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Tri-Met, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004