Talman v. Talman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
wife was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce on May 8, 1952; it incorporated in haec verba a property settlement agreement. The decree provided that plaintiff pay to defendant 16 per cent of his income (as that term was therein defined) for her support, and 8 per cent for child support. No minimum or maximum amounts were set up in either agreement or decree.
On November 4, 1960, plaintiff, on order to show cause, sought to modify the support provisions of the decree. On the day of the hearing (January 10, 1961) defendant filed a motion to dismiss the order to show cause on the ground…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Gardner v. Rich Manufacturing Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- DeWITT v. GlazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leonoff v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Carroll v. Puritan Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Howard A. Deason & Co. v. Costa Tierra Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Eichler Homes, Inc. v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.