Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Puritan Leasing Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1978No. Civ. 50655PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal issued when plaintiff (hereinafter appellant) failed to amend the complaint within the time allowed by the court after the demurrer of *484defendant Puritan Leasing Company (hereinafter Puritan) had been sustained.
In February 1972, appellant executed a written guarantee of the performance of certain lease agreements which existed between her then husband, Nicholas A. Mitrovich, and respondent Puritan Leasing Company. Under the lease, Puritan supplied Mr. Mitrovich with restaurant equipment. Thereafter, appellant and her…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Chern v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Thibodeau v. CrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Karlin v. ZaltaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Alhino v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.