DeWITT v. Glazier
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
After trial by jury in a malpractice action, a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant doctors, upon which judgment was entered. A motion for new trial was denied. In her appeal from the judgment plaintiff seeks a review of the propriety of such order.
The limited record before us for purposes of this appeal consists of the clerk’s transcript, a partial reporter’s transcript comprising the voir dire examination of the prospective jurors, and a transcript of the proceedings at the hearing of the motion for new trial.
Although the record of the trial is not before us, the clerk’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Williams v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Shipley v. Permanente Hospital (1954)California Court of Appeal · 1954
- MacPherson v. West Coast Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Kulko v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Jordan v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.