Legal Opinion

DeWITT v. Glazier

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1957No. Civ. 21819PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

After trial by jury in a malpractice action, a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant doctors, upon which judgment was entered. A motion for new trial was denied. In her appeal from the judgment plaintiff seeks a review of the propriety of such order.

The limited record before us for purposes of this appeal consists of the clerk’s transcript, a partial reporter’s transcript comprising the voir dire examination of the prospective jurors, and a transcript of the proceedings at the hearing of the motion for new trial.

Although the record of the trial is not before us, the clerk’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Williams v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Shipley v. Permanente Hospital (1954)California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. MacPherson v. West Coast Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. HamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Kulko v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Jordan v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API