Legal Opinion
In Re Howard
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1925No. Docket No. 1225PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
On petition of Albert Howard, a writ of habeas corpus was allowed herein. On return duly made the matter has been submitted for decision.
On the thirteenth day of May, 1924, in the police court of the city of Los Angeles, in an action wherein the petitioner was defendant, he pleaded guilty to a charge of misdemeanor. Thereupon the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment in the city jail for the term of 180 days. At the same time the court made this order: “Execution suspended for 3 days.” At that time, the defendant was in fact allowed his liberty without any order of court to that effect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- People v. MendosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. O'DonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- In Re GianniniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Ellis v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- US Fid. & Guar. Co. v. JUSTICE COURT OF VISTA TOWNSHIPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- In re TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.