Legal Opinion

People v. Mendosa

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1918No. Crim. No. 2179. In BankPublishedCited by 33 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree and appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The judgment pronounced upon such conviction was as follows:

“The said Albert Mendosa having been duly convicted in this court of the crime of burglary in the second degree, it is therefore ordered that said Albert Mendosa be punished by imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin for a period of not less than one nor more than five years; it is further ordered by the court that the sentence be suspended and the defendant remanded to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Franklin v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Callahan v. William F.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. YoudersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. WallachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API