Legal Opinion
People v. Mendosa
California Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1918No. Crim. No. 2179. In BankPublishedCited by 33 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree and appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The judgment pronounced upon such conviction was as follows:
“The said Albert Mendosa having been duly convicted in this court of the crime of burglary in the second degree, it is therefore ordered that said Albert Mendosa be punished by imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin for a period of not less than one nor more than five years; it is further ordered by the court that the sentence be suspended and the defendant remanded to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by33 opinions
- Franklin v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Callahan v. William F.California Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. YoudersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. WallachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.