People v. O'Donnell
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate originally filed in the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District to require the Superior Court to accept and exercise jurisdiction of a certain proceeding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court." U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General; and Arthur Lindauer, for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to require the respondent to accept and exercise jurisdiction of a certain proceeding instituted by the petitioner, as district attorney of Solano County, in the court of which the respondent is the presiding judge.
The facts as gleaned from the petition are: That one Luther R. Perry, having previously to the seventeenth day of July, 1914, been by a magistrate of Solano County held for trial in the said superior court for failure to provide his minor children, with the common necessaries of life (Pen. Code, sec. 270), was, on the day named,…
2Cited by33 opinions
- In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.