Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1941No. Cr. A. 1757; Cr. A. 1760PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

For convenience we shall refer to the first of the above cases, with its three defendants, as the Lopez case, and the second one, with its sole defendant, as the Fagan case. There was no trial in either ease; all of the defendants pleaded guilty, judgment following immediately without the taking of any evidence and without any reference to or report from a probation officer.

PROCEEDINGS IN LOPEZ CASE.

In the Lopez case the three defendants were charged with petty theft of personal property of the approximate value of $15. Represented by counsel, they entered a plea of guilty, and then the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. HainlineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. KrissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. People v. SaadAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1951
  5. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API