Legal Opinion
In re Taylor
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1934No. Crim. No. 2570PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
A petition on behalf of Claude Taylor for a writ of habeas corpus was allowed and wre are here considering the matter after return and submission.
Taylor was convicted of an offense, probation was denied and he was sentenced to the “County jail . . . for the term of ninety days, to be served from 7.00 p. m. of Monday to 6.00 p. m. of Wednesday”. (Quotation from judgment.) The ninety days have not run and it is claimed that Taylor is imprisoned under a void sentence. We think not. By the provisions of section 1203 of the Penal Code suspension of sentence is limited to probation and probation in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by12 opinions
- Oster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Ellis v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. RicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re EyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.