Legal Opinion

In Re Giannini

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1912No. Crim. No. 228PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPLICATION for discharge upon writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner on the tenth day of June, 1911, entered a plea of guilty to the charge of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor contrary to the provisions of an ordinance of Tulare county. The court thereupon adjudged that, as punishment for the offense committed, “the said defendant Francisco Giannini do pay a fine of seventy-five dollars, and in case said fine is not paid within one hour from the time of rendering judgment, that you, Francisco Giannini, defendant, be imprisoned in the county jail of the county of Tulare, state of California, until the fine be duly satisfied, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Ex Parte MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. LippnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Richardson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. In Re LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Way v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Nix v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API