Hungler v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
Initially, both parties to this appeal have assigned as error the appellate court’s determination to remand for further litigation the issue of the city manager’s authority to abolish positions in the complement of thirty-nine lieutenants funded through the mandate of city council.1 This issue was not raised either at trial or on appeal and, as the court of appeals itself pointed out, there was not sufficient basis in the record upon which the court could make a determination of error relative to it.
The authority of the appellate courts is carefully set forth in the Ohio Constitution and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- C. Miller Chevrolet, Inc. v. City of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Morgan v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. PeaglerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. StamperOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Maust v. Meyers Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.