Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reitter Stucco, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2008No. 2007-0060PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In this direct appeal, we are asked to determine whether appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio abused its discretion in finding that appellee Tony A. Mayle’s discharge from employment did not preclude him from continuing to receive compensation for his temporary total disability. Upon review, we find that it did not.

{¶ 2} Mayle injured his back in 2003 while working for appellant Reitter Stucco, Inc. Over the next several months, Mayle’s symptoms did not improve, and surgery was recommended. That operation went forward on July 12, 2004.

{¶ 3} After surgery, Mayle undertook physical…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Pretty Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Klein v. Precision Excavating & Grading Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Ohio State Univ. v. PrattOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State ex rel. Cordell v. Pallet Cos., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Hildebrand v. Wingate Transport, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State ex rel. Walmart, Inc. v. HixsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API