Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Walmart, Inc. v. Hixson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2021No. 19AP-323PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Walmart, Inc. v. Hixson,

2021-Ohio-3802.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Walmart, Inc., : Relator, : No. 19AP-323 v. : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Dianna L. Hixson et al., : Respondents. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on October 26, 2021 On brief: Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Douglas E. Spiker, Timothy J. Webster, and Monica L. Frantz, for relator. On brief: Nager, Romaine & Schneiberg, Co., L.P.A., and James Zink, for respondent Dianna L. Hixson. On brief: Dave Yost, Attorney General, Jacquelyn McTigue, for respondent Industrial Commission of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. AutoZone Stores, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Coppo v. Fixari Family Dental Practice, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State ex rel. Cleveland Metro. School Dist. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State ex rel. Quest Diagnostics, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API