Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1993No. 1992-2399PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 4123.56(B) provides:

“Where an employee * * * suffers a wage loss as a result of returning to employment other than his former position of employment or as a result of being unable to find employment consistent with the claimant’s physical capabilities, he shall receive compensation at sixty-six and two-thirds of his weekly wage loss not to exceed the statewide average weekly wage for a period not to exceed two hundred weeks.”

Supplementing the statute, Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-32(D) reads:

“In injury claims in which the date of injury * * * is on or after August 22, 1986, the payment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State ex rel. McGraw v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Marsolek v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API