Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. 93-2545PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Per curiam

Louisiana-Pacific informed the commission of claimant’s dismissal at the May 8, 1992 staff hearing. The staff hearing officer order that followed did not, however, mention the termination. In its complaint for a writ of mandamus, L-P claimed that the omission was an abuse of discretion and sought a writ ordering the commission to vacate the May 8, 1992 order. The appellate court declined, essentially ruling that claimant did not voluntarily abandon his employment. For the reasons to follow, its judgment is reversed.

Voluntary departure from employment precludes temporary total disability…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Baker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Baker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API