Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pretty Products, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1996No. 94-1845PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

This case presents the question of whether the Industrial Commission abused its discretion by finding that the claimant did not voluntarily abandon her position of employment, and that further temporary total disability compensation should be awarded. Because of the vagueness of the commission’s order, we must remand for further explanation and clarification of the reasoning supporting that order.

The receipt of temporary total disability (“TTD”) compensation rests on a claimant’s inability to return to his or her former job as a direct result of an industrial injury. State ex rel. Ramirez v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior's Brand Meats, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Klein v. Precision Excavating & Grading Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Pretty Products, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Reitter Stucco, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API