Legal Opinion

In Re Logan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 13, 1976PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

James Logan, Jr., a member of the bar in this state, has been charged with violations of certain ethical standards in two separate proceedings, hereinafter referred to as the Liddell and Parmigiani matters. After hearings had been held on both matters, the Burlington County Ethics Committee submitted two presentments to this Court, in response to which we issued an order to show cause why the respondent should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined with respect to each presentment. During the course of the proceedings, respondent moved to dismiss both charges on the basis of a general…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bauer & Cie v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re Application of LiVolsiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Mississippi State Bar v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Matter of DoeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API