Bauer & Cie v. O'Donnell
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The facts, which involve the construction of § 4884, Rev. Stat., and the extent of the, rights thereunder óf patentees to control the price at which the patented article shall be sold by their vendees, are stated in the opinion. . The inventor has the right to exclude every one from any making, using, or selling of the patented invention.
Read the full summary
CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The facts, which involve the construction of § 4884, Rev. Stat., and the extent of the, rights thereunder óf patentees to control the price at which the patented article shall be sold by their vendees, are stated in the opinion. . The inventor has the right to exclude every one from any making, using, or selling of the patented invention. Therefore, when he grants any right under the patent to anyone, he simply waives his right to exclude_them from all'making, using, or selling of the patented invention to that extent, and all…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This case is on a certificate from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. The facts stated in the certificate are:
“Bauer & Cie, of Berlin, Germany, copartners, being the assignees of letters patent of. the United States, dated April 5, 1898, No. 601,995, covering a certain water soluble albumenoid known as ‘Sanatogen’ and the process of manufacturing the same, about July, 1907, entered into an agreement with F. W. Hehmeyer, doing business in the City of New York under the trade name of The Bauer Chemical Company, whereby Hehmeyer became .and has-since been the sole agent and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.