Legal Opinion
Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park District
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 12, 1930No. 237 and 238PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes
These two cases were argued together and present substantially the same questions. Each suit was brought in the state court by a taxpayer attacking the validity of the Park District Act of the State (General Code of Ohio, secs. 2976-1 to 2976-1Oi; 107 O. L. 65-69, 108 O. L., pt. 2, 1097-1100). The one suit related to tie Park District Board of the Akron District, and the other to that of the. Cleveland District, and in each suit the taxpayer sought an injunction against the Park Boards, respectively, together with the auditor of the county where the Board revenues and disbursements are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.