In Re Application of LiVolsi
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
WILENTZ, C. J.
This case involves challenges to the constitutionality and desirability of the Fee Arbitration Committees (Committees) established by this Court in E.1:20A pursuant to our constitutional authority to regulate the practice of law. The Rule’s purpose was to provide a satisfactory mechanism for the resolution of fee disputes between attorneys and their clients. As presently constituted, a Committee must arbitrate fee disputes upon a client’s request (whether the lawyer consents or not), or ■ upon a lawyer’s request if the client consents.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- In Re the Revocation of the License of PolkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Knight v. City of MargateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Shaner v. Horizon Bancorp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.