Legal Opinion

Voorhees v. Nabob Silver-Lead Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1933No. 24431. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought by respondent, as administrator' of the former law partnership of Voorhees & Canfield, to recover $750 from appellant for attorney fees.

The complaint, after making allegations of the corporate existence of appellant, the partnership of Voorhees & Canfield, the death of Canfield'and the appointment and qualification of respondent as administrator of the partnership of .Voorhees & Canfield, alleges that, prior to the death of Canfield, the partnership, at the instance and request of appellant, rendered legal services for it in a civil case wherein one Tweedell and others…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Haines v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ashley v. VischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Caldwell v. HurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Sacajawea Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Skookum Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Debritz v. SylviaWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Evans v. Yakima Valley, Grape Growers Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Grismer v. Merger Mines CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1942
  4. Edwards v. Surety Finance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Evans v. YAKIMA ETC. ASS'N.Washington Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API