Legal Opinion
Grismer v. Merger Mines Corporation
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided March 21, 1942No. 230PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELLENBACH, District Judge.
This is a stockholders’ bill in equity to compel the defendant corporation (called Merger hereafter) and its President, the defendant Pearson, to perform a, contract between them in a manner equitable to all the stockholders. In order to confine this opinion to reasonable bounds, I am filing simultaneously herewith a detailed opinion as to the facts.
Merger is an Arizona mining development concern which is completely dominated by the defendant Pearson. Its principal place of business, where all its books and records are kept, is in Spokane, Washington. The…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McQuillen v. National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TMT Bear Creek Shopping Center, Inc. v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Evans v. YAKIMA ETC. ASS'N.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- Evans v. Yakima Valley, Grape Growers Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Hunter v. Merger Mines CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.