Legal Opinion · Dissent

Edwards v. Surety Finance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1934No. 24825. Department OnePublished

1Dissent

Beals, O. J.

(dissenting) — I concur in the foregoing opinion save in so far as it holds that an action to recover money paid upon a contract in writing which was, in fact, usury, is barred by the three-year statute of limitations.

Under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 157, paragraph 2, “An action upon a contract in writing, or liability express or implied arising out of a written agreement,” is barred unless commenced within six years after the accrual of the cause of action.

In the case of Caldwell v. Hurley, 41 Wash. 296, 83 Pac. 318, this court considered the section of the statute of limitations above…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Haines v. Coastwise Steamship & Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Warren v. RicklesWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Caldwell v. HurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Ihrke v. Continental Life Insurance & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API